Cowon Plenue L DAP

Comparison.

Here I tested and compared PL vs other DAPs, volume matched in each comparison using U18t (w/Leo II cable) and Andromeda (w/stock cable). Of course, you need to keep in mind that PL lacks Bluetooth (especially duplex receive/transmit BT to stream from smartphone) and the ability to run apps due to no WiFi and app store support. If that’s your important requirement, PL is not for you. But if you are into a pure playback and need a flexibility to shape the sound – JetEffect DSP effects and PL’s semi-Parametric EQ are among the best.

PL vs theBit Opus#2 – a similar soundstage expansion, with PL being just a little wider. In terms of tonality, PL sounds more natural, smoother, while in comparison #2 is a bit raw and brighter in tonality. Also, PL has a more expanded dynamics with a better layering and separation of sounds. I wouldn’t say #2 is congested, but I’m just hearing PL a little better in this technical performance. Also, #2 has a lot more hissing in comparison to nearly dead quiet PL when used with Andro.

PL vs iBasso DX200 w/AMP1 – very similar soundstage expansion, both in width and depth. DX200 with default amp tonality is a little brighter, making its sound more reference while PL sounds a little smoother. In terms of sound signature, PL bass is more neutral while DX200 sub-bass has a little lift in rumble. Technically, they both have a similar sound dynamics expansion and layering/separation of the sounds. Used with Andro, DX200 has more hissing.

PL vs Luxury & Precision L6 – very similar soundstage expansion, both in width and depth. Regarding tonality, due to higher output impedance of L6/BAL out, without iEMatch L6 bass is leaner and tonality is a lot brighter in comparison to a more natural neutral PL. With iEMatch, the signature and the tonality of L6 is a lot closer to PL, except PL treble is a little smoother and more natural in comparison. Technically, they are on the same level with dynamics expansion and layering/separation. With Andro, PL is nearly dead quiet while L6 has a noticeable hissing.

PL vs Astell & Kern SP1000 SS – very similar soundstage expansion, just with PL being a little bit wider. In terms of tonality, SPK is smoother and a little bit warmer in mids, while PL is more neutral and a little more revealing in mids. Both have a similar treble rendering which is more natural and less peaky. Technically, I feel PL has a little better layering/separation where I hear a little more air between the layers, while SPK is smoother and more musical in comparison. With Andro, SKP has a touch more hissing, while PL is nearly dead quiet.

PL vs Sony WM1Z – very similar soundstage expansion, just with PL being a touch wider. In comparison, WM1Z has more sub-bass rumble with a little stronger mid-bass punch and a little more sparkle in treble, while rendering of mids is nearly identical in both DAPs. So, the tonality is rather similar, but the signature change stands out, especially due to stronger bass impact in 1Z. Technically, they are nearly identical when it comes to dynamics expansion and layering/separation of sounds. With Andro, 1Z has a touch more hissing, while PL is nearly dead quiet.

PL vs Lotoo Paw Gold Touch – very similar soundstage expansion, just with LPGT being a touch wider. This comparison has a lot of similarities. While both are neutral and very resolving, I can still spot a difference in a blind test with LPGT being a touch more neutral and slightly wider in soundstage while PL having a little deeper low end, a bit more revealing upper mids, and a touch more sparkle in treble. Technically, they are a good match with a similar dynamics expansion and separation/layers between the sounds (you can hear more air between the layers). Both are also nearly dead quiet with Andro.

PL vs P2 mk2 – Plenue L exterior is very similar to Plenue 2/2mk2. Interface is nearly identical as well. Of course, you get ES9038Pro DAC and a more powerful 4.4mm Balanced output. I hear PL with a more holographic 3D soundstage and improved imaging in comparison to Plenue 2/mk2, also the sound is more dynamic, more layered, especially when playing higher res DSD files. PL has a tighter, better controlled, more articulate, layered bass with a deeper extension (more textured rumble). Also, the lower treble is a little smoother, more natural. Perhaps there is not as big gap in tonality, but in terms of sound performance you can really hear the difference. Plus, with a lot more powerful BAL output, you can easily drive demanding headphones more efficiently in comparison to P2/mk2.

cowon_plenue_l-44

Other connections.

USB DAC.

I’m not a big fan of using a dedicated audio player as USB DAC because I usually look at a DAP as a portable standalone source. If you are not happy with an audio output of your computer, there are plenty of dedicated USB DAC choices. But in some cases, when you are traveling and don’t want to bring multiple pieces of equipment, using DAP as USB DAC has its advantage.

Using PL as USB DAC was very straight forward. Drivers were installed automatically as soon as I connected PL to my Win7 ThinkPad T430s, there was no need to install custom drivers. When connection is detected, you have a choice from the touch screen to either select USB DAC or USB MSC (for a file transfer). Once you select USB DAC, my laptop volume was set to the max and I was able to adjust the volume from PL. The only negative here, DSP effects are disabled when in USB DAC mode.

In terms of the sound quality, playing the same song from laptop while using PL as USB DAC vs playing it directly from PL – there is a noticeable sound difference where the quality is higher playing it from PL directly. Using PL as usb DAC is convenient to enhance your laptop audio output, but for the best audio fidelity I recommend playing audio directly from PL. Also, seems that after you disconnect PL as usb DAC, it automatically powers down since there is no way to turn off DAC mode without rebooting PL.

 

Optical Out.

PL vs PL + Micro iDSD BL – In this pair up test with iDSD the sound is a little warmer and has a deeper low end impact when compared to listening directly from PL which has a more transparent tonality with a more linear low end response. The rest is similar. It’s a great option to be able to use PL as a digital touch screen transport driving external DAC/amp supporting optical input. Also, in this pair up the volume can only be controlled from iDSD.

cowon_plenue_l-41

Line out.

Plenue DAPs don’t have a dedicated Line Out port, and instead they suggest setting volume to the max in high gain where the HO acts as LO and there shouldn’t be any distortion. I have verified this in the past with previous Plenue DAPs but didn’t have interest to try it with PL since I found 3.5mm SE output to be inferior to 4.4mm BAL and I don’t have any BAL amps to test it with 4.4mm output.

Conclusion.

While I never had a chance to hear Plenue S, based on every other Plenue DAP I have tested so far, PL is got to be my favorite one to date. I honestly don’t know why Cowon chose to call it L and what it even means, but Plenue L clearly follows the design evolution of P2 -> P2 mk2 -> PL with a very similar exterior design which almost calls for this DAP to be P3. But, regardless of what it’s called, PL is their new flagship DAP which takes all the previous legacy elements and ups it with an updated audio performance optimized around the latest desktop quality ES9038Pro DAC and high power 4.4mm BAL output.

Cowon philosophy was always focused on sound performance as their highest priority. Even so they did implement a basic Bluetooth functionality in Plenue R model, it seems that Cowon is one of the few companies who doesn’t care as much about streaming or app support or even the latest trend of duplex BT to stream from the smartphone. That certainly will play an important role when you’re choosing your next flagship DAP. But if high resolution audio playback from a local storage is your top priority, and you are looking for a lightweight, compact portable DAP with a fast customizable interface, top quality audio performance, high power BAL output (low noise and hiss-free), beautiful design, and very powerful JetEffect DSP effects for sound shaping – Plenue L deserves a serious consideration.

I have access to a lot of flagship DAPs, but not all of them are portable enough for everyday use on the go. In the last month Plenue L got a lot of mileage when I’m choosing which DAP I bring with me to work because it’s one of the smallest and the lightest flagship players in my review rotation. Unfortunately, other flagships are getting bigger, heavier, less portable, so I’m glad Cowon is in tune with consumers demand, still keeping the portability and the sound quality as their top priorities.

 

Advertisements

26 thoughts on “Cowon Plenue L DAP

  1. Hi,
    Great review as usual I am swiss fan !
    I Planned to pourchase this great DAP with my OPPO PM-3 How did you get the angle 4.4 mm adapter showed in your nice photo, it will be very useful to know.
    Thanks and best regards
    Frank

    Like

    1. That adapter came from Musicteck, the US store where it cost about $25. I don’t think they ship overseas, or if they do, it could be expensive. You can contact them to find out, www. musicteck.com. Or maybe search on ebay or your local amazon? Also, ibasso has an upcoming CA04 right angled 4.4mm pigtail adaptor (you can see see it in my ibasso IT01s review). I don’t see it for sale yet, but worth pinging them to find out, it’s also cheap and ibasso will send it to any country in the world. Just have to wait for another 2 weeks since they all out due to Chinese New Year.

      Like

    1. I still pick PL because in addition to a great pair up, sooner or later you will end up expanding your headphones/earphone collection and PL will be just better 😉 Plus, you can’t even compare the user interface, and the flexibility of PL jeteffect DSP effects takes it to yet another level. Plus, don’t forget, if you ever decide to upgrade and sell PL, you won’t have any problem doing that while it’s going to be a different story with L6 😉

      Like

  2. Hello from Russia, dear Twister6! Excellent review, thank you! How does this model compare to plenue s? Does it make sense to move from S to L?
    P.S. sorry for my english!

    Like

      1. At the forum player. Many praise PS, write top sound, compared with LPG, only the scene is wider. But the comparison between PL and PS is also, unfortunately, no.
        I just live in a deep periphery and there is no opportunity to listen! Therefore, only thanks to you and those like you can navigate the world of portable audio, for which I thank you! But in the price range up to $ 2000, so you are advised to consider the purchase?

        Like

      2. Hello! Tell me how PL in terms of genre versatility? I listen from heavy metal to classic 🙂 And if you compare PL with tops, does this mean that they are approximately at the same level?

        Like

      3. DAPs are not genre specific, iems are. PL like many other daps is quite versatile. And yes, its sound quality, especially when using balanced output, is top notch and on the level with other flagships. The difference comes down to amount of features where PL is playback only, so no Bluetooth or pairing with smartphone for streaming, etc.

        Liked by 1 person

    1. I haven’t, but on Head-fi in PL thread a few people reported about having no problem with 400GB cards. But, Plenue can’t guarantee compatibility with all higher capacity cards. I know, that’ sad.

      Like

  3. Hi, I know that you are very busy and I know you already did comparison with dx200/Amp 1 but I was wondering if you could please also do a comparison with dx200/Amp 8… Please? But I understand if it is not possible at the moment. Thank you!

    Like

  4. Great review. I’m usually working on the road and still very happy with my P2Mk2 paired with campfire audio andromeda headphones. When I’m home I’ll plug in the Audeze LCD-X. I’m a bass player so I lean toward good sounding bass with all audio gear. I would be interested to hear your playlist for testing audio gear. I’m sure it helps to have a set number of songs to compare. Or do you use scientific audio clips?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s