Design.
Starting with exterior dimensions, DX220 is 126mm x 70.5mm x 18.7mm, very close to DX200 128.5mm x 69mm x 19.5mm, plus both weight the same 240g. Up close you can’t miss the new big 5” 1080p Sharp full screen display with 1080×1920 resolution, while the original DX200 has 4.2” display with 768×1280 resolution. The new display is not just bigger and sharper, but the colors are richer and deeper. Its 2.5D Corning glass panel covers the whole front of the DAP, all you see is a thin bezel of beveled chassis edges.
Since DX220 has a modular design like DX200 and amp cards are backward/forward compatible, the module is still at the bottom behind the glass with edges seamlessly integrated with main chassis. A screw on each side secures the amp module. The rest of the ports and controls around the DAP are similar to DX200. On the left you will find a spring loaded micro-SD card opening, on the top there is SPDIF port shared between COAX and Optical outputs. Next to SPDIF port, you will find USB-C charge/data port, and Power button (for screen on/off with a short press and power on/off with a long press) is in the upper right corner, flush with chassis.
On the right side you no longer will see a guard bar over the volume wheel. Design is cleaner now with a solid one piece chassis and nothing else attached in the upper right corner. Volume wheel doesn’t stick out too far, has a diamond cut along the side for easy one-finger rolling, and has a precise tactile response with a soft click feedback. Below it, you have playback control buttons, all metal, the same size, flush with a chassis, with Play/Pause in the middle and Skip on the sides. It looks and feels nice in your hand, but I still prefer and recommend keeping DX220 in a leather case to enhance the grip.
Under the hood.
In this section I usually cover inner guts of the new design, but in case of DX220 not too much has changed, at least not when it comes to the main components. According to iBasso, they looked at all the available DACs, and still decided to use dual ES9028Pro configuration, the same as in DX200. Based on my discussions with iBasso, they put audio quality as their #1 priority, above any “next gen” marketing buzz. The selection of those desktop grade DACs for DX200 was a way for iBasso to futureproof their design, and they did it, even carrying it over into the next gen DX220 flagship.
To my surprise hardware was updated with 4GB of DDR3 RAM, but the CPU remained the same, Octa-Core ARM Cortex-A53 as the one used in DX200. So, what does this mean? I can only judge by running new Mango v2 app and other apps I loaded on DX220, and I do feel apps running smoother, but overall Android experience is the same, and I even confirmed that by running a few benchmark tests. Do I need a faster Android OS on DX220? I already have a smartphone and half of the time use DX220 in Mango OS anyway, so it’s definitely not a show stopper for me. But, I would have loved to see it with either Qualcomm Snapdragon or Samsung Exynos processors because with its gorgeous 5” display and 4GB of RAM I would have probably used DX220 for more entertainment tasks than just music.
Internal storage remained the same as DX200, only 64GB which I would have loved to see doubled, but it’s not a show stopper either with microSD cards going up in capacity, plus DX220 being able to stream. Battery remained the same, 4400mAh, but now you have a Fast Charging capability supporting all popular protocols, such as QC3.0, PD2.0, and MTK PE Plus. That is a big plus and a welcome change. In my DX220 battery testing, I was able to get a solid 8hrs of playback time in low gain from 2.5mm balanced output playing mix of mp3/FLAC files.
If you want to, DX220 can also be used as high end USB DAC, a.k.a. external “soundcard”, supporting PCM up to 32bit/384kHz and native DSD up to 512, the same as in a standalone DAP operation. Also, some miscellaneous components were updated, using Panasonic polymer capacitors and custom inductors, as well as high accuracy femtosecond precision oscillators.
Bluetooth has been upgraded to 5.0 and supports LDAC and aptX. BT operates in 2-way mode where you can either pair up with external Bluetooth devices or use DX220 paired up with your smartphone as Bluetooth wireless DAC/amp. And speaking of Bluetooth, the antenna now is outside the chassis in isolation cavity to cut down on interference with internal circuit. Dual band (2.4GHz/5GHz) WiFi is supported as well.
As already mentioned, this is still a modular design, and amp modules are forward and backward compatible. This means you can share the same amp modules between DX150, DX200/Ti, and DX220, and have access to all the previously released and upcoming modules, like a promised AMP9 with Korg NuTube. DX220 comes with a new stock AMP1ii (2nd gen AMP1) amp with an impressive spec of 2.5mm: 6.2Vrms, SNR 125dB, 3.5mm: 3.1Vrms, SNR 123dB, and LO: 3Vrms.
Last, but not least, though I’m not an expert on MQA subject and don’t have any MQA encoded songs in my collection, according to iBasso, DX220 will support hardware decoding of MQA. Furthermore, I have seen a few people to comment about it on Head-fi with a positive feedback.
Page 3 – New Mango v2 interface, Mango OS, Graphic and Parametric EQs.
Page 4 – Sound Analysis and Pair up.
Page 5 – Comparison, Wired/wireless connection, and Conclusion.
Twister6 Reviews 
Great review! I am loving my DX220. It is a large step up from my n5ii. Quick question: when using the line out, I am must to having the output fixed, and was surprised to see the volume control come into play. What gain and volume should it be set at for best performance?
LikeLike
It will all depend on the amp you have connected to LO. You don’t want it to clip. So, maybe keep the gain of the amp somewhere in the middle and raise the volume of dx220. If you reach the volume over 75-80%, then boost the gain of the amp.
LikeLike
Nice review! Regarding my earphones (Andromeda & Xelento), do you think dx220 is a solid upgrade (sound wise) over my current dap Hiby R6.
LikeLike
Definitely. R6Pro, still have to review it, is great as well and I like mseb dsp effects, plus it’s super fast, faster android performance than dx220. But dx220 stepped it up to a higher sound performance.
LikeLike
Sono indeciso tra plenue l e ibasso dx 220. Quale prendere?
LikeLike
In English, please.
LikeLike
Nice review as always. Still undecided, whether to upgrade my R6 to R6pro or DX220 or now N6ii.. i read r6pro had hiss problem on some iem.. my earphones now tia trio, mh334 (problem pairing with R6) and moondrop A8..
LikeLike
A long awaited and greatly appreciated review.
Many thanks and congrats on being able to wait out 150 hours of break-in before being able to sample this new piece of kit 🙂
From memory h0w would you consider the sound signature and power of the DX220 to the Cayin N8?
Did you find battery life to be on par with the DX200?
I also have some off topic questions regarding audio equipment. Is there a general discussion board I can use or should I post them here?
Very nice review
LikeLike
send me a message on FB https://www.facebook.com/alextwister6
LikeLike
Great review. I wonder; when burning in a dap, should one also activate the EQ circuits to burn them in too? Or does it ‘not work like that’… I’ve never been a EQ guy, but i’m wondering if the circuitry just needs to be burned in.
LikeLike
Eq is done in software, it’s not a hardware chip. Besides, the components which benefit from burn in are capacitors and inductors.
LikeLike
Ah, I see! Excellent, thanks!
LikeLike
Hi again, Twister. Can you sum up the difference between the dx220 and the A&K SE-100’s sound signatures? Is one ‘better’ than the other?
LikeLike
I only heard SE100 for 5min at CanJam, so not familiar with it. Sorry.
LikeLike
Hello, Alex!
Very interestingly as dx220 in comparison with cayin n6 mk2? Loses on a sound, or devices of one level, just different giving? So to speak matter of taste:)
LikeLike
I should have N6ii first look write up in a few days, will mention comparison to DX220.
LikeLike
I like the iBasso DX220 with replaceable card design, Can you sum up the difference between the dx220, fiio M11 and hiby r6 pro,thanks
LikeLike
I already compared dx220 to many other daps in my review, on the last page. I didn’t have M11 until now, and M11 has a great design, build, functionality, but its sound is just mid-fi, not on the same level as other flagships like dx220 or N6ii or even fiio older flagship X7ii. For many consumers M11 will be great, but if you are a picky audiophile, you will find M11 to sound flatter, not as layered, and with more hissing when using sensitive iems. Just my opinion.
LikeLike
I was going to purchase the DX220 but spotted a thread on Head-Fi.org where people were saying they were only getting 4 to 5 hours battery life. Can anyone shed some light on this? https://www.head-fi.org/threads/ibasso-dx220-battery-life-issues.910525/
LikeLike
if you are streaming with constant display on, or high gain, or play hi-res files or switched from 720p to 1080p resolution, all will add up to extra battery consumption. Under normal circumstances of playing a mix of mp3/flac, with period display on, at 720p resolution, I get 8hrs of payback with IEMs in low gain in 2.5mm balanced. But the battery life will go down when you push it with other stuff I mentioned above.
LikeLike
Could you, please, help me with my problem. Thinking about buying a new DAC (currently, I have dx80, quite satisfied but want more at this point). Choosing between A&K sp1000 and dx220. I understand that sp1000 should be better than dx220, but on what scale? Because sp1000 is older and also cost much more (in my region though difference is not so huge, 600USD). Is the difference in sound worth the price? I’ll listen sp1000 by myself but will not be able to get hands-on dx220 unfortunately… Can only order it via Amazon. I’ll also look for new IEMs and listen to some of them, but I think I’ll choose solaris se
LikeLike
what is your budget? Do you care about streaming? Bluetooth? What other daps do you consider?
LikeLike
My budget…good question) in the beginning I thought to buy smth like dx220+dunu4001. But then I saw huge sale at the nearest shop on solaris se and sp1000. This is more than I wanted to spend but…I can afford them, more or less (it would cost 2800 usd for me). And no, I don’t care about streaming and bluetooth at all. I am open-minded to other suggestions though, both about daps and iem-s
LikeLike
well, since you are coming of DX80, many daps will be an upgrade in sound and performance (better resolution, more resolving, better separation of instruments, etc.). Also, it sounds like you are not a very picky audiophile. SPK is great dap, but big and bulky to carry around like your dx80. DX220 is great, but you can save money and go with DX160. Solaris is great, but are you sure you wll be happy with a fit? Some people find it too big. SE version is brighter, btw. I personally prefer original over since it sounds more natural. If you want more natural sound maybe RAI Penta is a good choice, I’m not familiar with 4001, though I thought people were saying 4001 and 3001 were bright, while 3001 Pro was more natural in tonality. Heck you can get DX160 and ibaso IT04 for under $900 and it’s a great combo. There are dozens of DAPs and hundreds of IEMs. You don’t need to spend a lot of money to get something good. 3-4 year ago it was a different story. With iems, you need to figure out what sound you are looking for, and also read what people say about the fit. Dunu Luna is comfortable, I tried that one, but heard many older models were very uncomfortable to wear. Also, be aware, way too many amateur reviewers today, people without experience who use big words and promoting junk in exchange for free samples.
LikeLike
With iems – yeah, I am not so concerned about choosing them, as I will be able to listen to many of them and choose. Not ibasso unfortunately. My shop doesn’t have any ibasso or dunu products for some reason.
I will consider ibasso dx160+it04 as you suggested. But since I cannot listen to them, could you tell me, is there like a significant difference in sound quality between them and sp1k+solaris se, for example? or it is more like “I have a lot of money to spend, so I will pay 3x times more for 10% better sound”. Because even if they are much better than mine dx80+d2000j, maybe difference with dx160+it04 is not so significant.
And yeah, I am not such a person who believes that software (mango os on linux vs android os on A&K) or usb or power cables in your audio system affect sound. But I want to buy something I will be happy with for 5+ years. Because I have dx80+2000j for 4 or 5 years, and I have started to think that I want more.
LikeLike
Also, for example, how sp1k and ibasso dx160 compares with lotoo paw6000? I am not sure though how to get it in Australia..
LikeLike
i see. yes, geographic location plays a big role when you’re down under and won’t be able to return it back if you don’t like it. Tbh, in your situation stick to something you can test. Are there some stores in your area with audio gear on display? PAW6k is great, solid DAP and very compact. The thing, price no longer means everything. PAW6k not going to sound 3x better than Dx160, just like SPK will not sound 9x better than DX160. DX220 gives you flexibility of different amp modules, and ibasso usually focuses more on sound quality, not necessary the fastest processor…. So, my advice, don’t go for the most expensive thinking it will be the best. Figure out your priorities in terms of what features you do or don’t need. And maybe try to buy something which you can return if you don’t like it (i just google “audio store in australia” and see a few choices). Cayin makes nice daps, like N6ii w/A01 stock card. Hiby R6 Pro is nice, and even R5 is good. iBasso kicked arse with DX160 release, though bluetooth performance wasn’t as strong. Read different reviews, some more ideas. Good luck!
LikeLike
Actually, I have only one shop to go, but they are on quarantine right now) They have sp1k (and some others), but not ibasso. There are people on forums, who say that they sold their sp1k or even sp2k, and that dx220 is better. And I know that A&K is quite overpriced, while ibasso is not so hungry for money with some good sound. But still those people could not convince me as they were saying things, like Mango is much better in terms of sound quality than android. And in the context of a price difference for me is actually only 600USD (1400AUD of dx220 and 2200AUD for sp1k), which one would you choose? That’s why I am asking if you can give some advice about their comparison. If like sp1k is better for 20%, not several times, it will be enough for me. But if dx220 is more or less equal or even better…
LikeLike
Hi, I need some recommendations.
I do have an iBasso DX90 and I think it’s time to replace it with another mid-tier DAP.
I already have better sounding or more expensive DAPs, but I’ll never take them out of my house for their value. So, this one will replace my DX90 just for walking or traveling, paired with my inseparable Shure SRH1540.
Which one do you recommend?
I think DX220 (with Amp9) and DX160 are my finalists.
LikeLike
from DX90, I would suggest DX160. For traveling/walking you want something more compact, and don’t really need modular design which only adds to its weight and size. And besides, I wouldn’t even recommend amp9, DX220 w/amp8 is their best amp. But like I said, DX160 should be a better choice for you.
LikeLike
The DAP I like most is the golden Sony NW-WM1Z that has recently surpassed my old favorite (Astell&Kern AK240, still great today for this musicality). I’d like to have a new DAP that could come closer to these two. Is the DX160 good enough?
LikeLike
You want to find $379 dap that will come closee to $3200 dap? 😉
LikeLike
Mmh, not exactly. I want something that doesn’t make me regret too much what I leave at home. DX90 was enough until recently, but now I think it’s getting outdated. But could be just personal. In my opinion AK240 is still great, no matter who says otherwise. What do you think?
LikeLike
Well, don’t have ak240, but have somewhere ak120ii collecting dust and it should be similar to 240. Those are ancient daps with old inferior dacs. Dx160 will sound better. But not better than wm1z, it still holds its own.
LikeLike
Between AK120II and AK240 there’s a huge gap, in favor of the latter. I recognize Sony’s superiority right now, but the NW-WM1Z belongs to the 2nd generation of DAPs, which has a lot of new competitors. 1st gen, instead, had just one winner, and it was AK240. Listening is believing.
Just a last question: why do you say amp9 is not good for DX220? A lot of listeners say it’s better than the amp8.
LikeLike
Listeners or reviewers say it is better? amp9 is the only amp I didn’t review, way too much hissing with IEMs, and underpowered to drive more demanding headphones. My big problem is that I use mostly IEMs and it hisses badly with all of them. Of course, it might be OK since you only intend to use it with your Shure headphones.
LikeLike
Ok, now I have the complete picture. Thanks
LikeLike
I finally bought a DX160 and it literally.. SUCKS! It’s way way worse than the old DX90!! Just soundstage and details are more pronounced, but voices (mids, if you prefer) are really thin, totally uninteresting. Musicality is a backward step. I know it sounds incredible, but I will never change my DX90 for a DX160! (I’m using Rockbox fw on DX90, and need to try Lurker’s fw on DX160, but I think it won’t change a lot).
So I’m now convinced that you don’t have to rely too much on DACs, but you need to try as much as possible. Time is relative, especially in sound.
LikeLike
sounds like its signature is not for you and you probably need a warm source. Don’t know what iems or headphones you are using and if they have a good pair up synergy with dx160, or maybe you mentioned before and I forgot. At the current moment all Shanling daps are warmer tuned. Maybe should try those, something like M6 Pro?
LikeLike
I’ll take them into consideration.
I’m now using SRH1540 to go around. At home, I have my adorable HD 650 and my outstanding LCD-3. So yes, I’m addicted to warm sound signature, probably.
LikeLike
Hi,
I just got an iBasso DX240. I am new to Android. I have tried to get the APK Pure to update. I have also tried to use it to install the Google Play Store. I have updated the 240 to the latest firmware. Whatever I do, I can’t get APK Pure to install anything.
Do you have any advice?
Kind regards,
Ben
LikeLike
I personally don’t like using apkpure app; just go to their website: apkpure dot com, search for Google Play Store, download apk, copy it to “download” directory on DX240 (you will have to connect dx240 to your computer, swipe down notification bar and in usb connection notification message make sure file transfer is selected), go to file manager on DX240, navigate to download directory and click on apk file to install it.
LikeLike
Hi,
Thank you. Will that work with a Mac? Presumably, you can’t do that from the 240’s own browser?
Cheers
LikeLike
I don’t use MAC, but when you go to apkpure website is just web browsing regardless of which platform you use. And, connecting your DAP to MAC is like connecting external usb drive. Don’t see why it wouldn’t work?
LikeLike
Thank you. Unfortunately, the the 240 isn’t appearing as a device attached to the Mac.
LikeLike