GUI.
As already mentioned, similar to DX200/DX220/MAX/DX300, DX320 has a dual boot system design where you have access to either full Android OS with its Mango audio app or stripped-down Mango OS with a main interface being that audio app itself. Each one has its advantages depending on user requirements. With access to full Android, you have support of WiFi and Bluetooth, can load other apps, stream audio, etc, though you have to be aware that stock DX320 doesn’t have Google Play. Instead, it comes pre-loaded with APKPure and CoolApk apps where you can search and download most of the apps to install on your DAP. But the easier way is to download and install Google Play straight from APKPure which I did without any issues.
One word of advice, once you install Google Play store, get rid of APKPure and CoolApk apps because they are only wasting resources while running in the background and constantly checking your installed apps.

Mango OS is a strip down version of operating system built around Mango app interface where the focus is strictly on audio performance without a waste of OS resources on other tasks. Switching between these two OS is very simple, when you boot up into Android and press’n’hold Power button you have a choice of switching to Mango, Power off, or Restart. When you switch to Mango, DAP is rebooted and will continue to boot into Mango OS every time until you go to Settings->Advanced and select Android System. Once Android System is selected, it will only boot into Android OS until you switch back to Mango OS.
DX320 comes with an updated version of Mango app, v2.7.2 which has some useful changes. There are a few differences between Mango app and Mango OS interface, they are not identical, and I will cover it later in the review, including differences in sound.
With a bigger 6.5” display, you have a better view of the embedded song/album artwork, if one is available. If not, a default image is displayed. As already introduced in v2 app of DX220, one change here is that you no longer have to swipe left/right to get to the file/song management and settings. The main playback screen has a more logical layout where you swipe the artwork display left/right to skip between the songs, and access song search and file management from a shortcut in the upper left corner and settings from a shortcut in the upper right corner. One brand new addition is in the lower right corner of artwork window where you have 3-dot shortcut to bring up Now Playing list of songs to scroll through – very useful feature.

Below the artwork, you have track info (bit/rate/format) and a scrub bar to advance through the song where you can tap anywhere to skip. While in early versions of Mango app you had to tap and drag the current song position to a new one, starting with v2 you can fast forward/back by simply tapping on a timeline like you would on your smartphone. Unfortunately, this only works in Mango app, not under Mango OS. Below it, you have a shortcut on the left to provide a more detailed info about the song (including adding to playlist or to delete), and another shortcut on the right to switch between playback modes (play in order, repeat list, shuffle, repeat current song). Play/Pause and Skip next/prev buttons are big enough and located at the bottom.
In Music search and track management, you can search through your songs (since it is indexed) or by browsing the internal storage directory. Under indexed list, you can view All Music, or sort by Album, Artist, Genre, Now Playing, and Playlist. Any song you long press will give you an option to Play, Add to playlist, or Delete. You also have a setting (3 vertical bars all the way on the right) to specify exactly what you want to see in navigation bar or how you want music to be sorted and viewed. The level of customization details here is quite impressive. Plus, all the way at the bottom you have a small area to see the currently playing song and to control its playback with play/pause button. Tapping on it takes you back to the main Playback screen.
In Settings Menu, you have access to Gapless (on/off), Gain (low, medium, high), Play mode (order, loop, shuffle, repeat, folder play), EQ (on/off, brings you to Graphic/Parametric EQ screen), L/R Balance, 2 Digital filters, Media Scan, and Advanced Setting. In Advanced you can select DSD filter and volume compensation, Unplug Pause (Pause when unplug headphones), Indicator (to enable indicator light), USB DAC, Bluetooth DAC, Display Setting, Sleep Timer, and System info.

There is also Audio Settings menu under Android Settings where you can adjust the volume, changing the Gain (low/mid/high), change output from PO to LO, Digital Filter settings, set Volume limitation (up to 63), set volume wheel control (when screen is off), and enable DSD volume compensation. Under Android Setting in Display section, you can find Auto-rotate screen function, Double-Tap screen to wake, and light Indicator on/off enable. As already mentioned, also in Settings under Audio Control Button menu you can enable/disable audio playback button or switch skip next/prev button assignment.
Notification bar swipe down is also VERY helpful where besides the usual WiFi, Bluetooth, and Auto-Rotate shortcuts, you can also change PO/LO, switch between 2 Digital Filters, and Change the Gain.

Mango app vs Mango OS
I’m sure many will be curious how does Mango app (in Android mode) compares to stripped down Mango OS. Here is a summary of some of the differences I found while testing DX320. There could be more, but these stood out for me.
- Mango OS start up is faster, while Mango app/Android takes a little longer.
- Mango app (in Android) navigation is faster, while Mango OS has a slight lag.
- Mango app (in Android) has EQ and PEQ, while Mango OS has only EQ.
- In Mango app you can randomly tap on timeline to advance to any part of the song, in Mango OS you have to drag the pointer to a new position like in original DX200.
- In Mango app “Now playing” directory/list is accessible when you click in lower right corner of artwork window, while in Mango OS you have to tap upper left corner to get to music sorting where you view “Now playing” list.
There are also differences in sound between Mango app and Mango OS, and I will cover it in sound analysis section of the review.
Mango OS
EQ
DX320 offers a traditional Graphic EQ (EQ) where frequency bands are fixed, and you only adjust the gain with a slider. In Mango app (Android mode) you also get Parametric EQ (PEQ) where you have a lot more control over which frequency is being adjusted, bandwidth of the frequency being adjusted, the type of the filter used to adjust the frequency, and of course the gain of the adjustment. Here are my observations while testing EQ and PEQ.
Graphic EQ (EQ)
- When enabled, drops the volume to create extra headroom for band adjustment (to avoid clipping).
- Relatively clean 10-band EQ adjustment (33, 63, 100, 330, 630, 1k, 3.3k, 6.3k, 10k, 16k frequency bands).
- Whenever you adjust a band, you can see it being shown graphically above the EQ sliders; great visual feedback.
- 5 genre specific presets are included where each one could be adjusted further and reset to its original state.

Parametric EQ (PEQ)
- Includes 6 custom preset settings.
- When enabled, volume doesn’t drop.
- While adjusting, I didn’t hear any distortion.
- Each preset setting has 6 assignable filters/frequencies to shape the sound where each one is represented by a different color on the screen.
- Filter types: low pass filter, high pass filter, band pass filter, notch filter, all pass filter, peaking filter, low shelf filter, high shelf filter – peaking filter will be probably the most useful.
- Each filter has: Fc (center frequency, from 33 to 16k), Gain (-20 to 20 dB), Q factor (0.3 to 20) where smaller Q makes the bandwidth wider and bigger Q makes the bandwidth narrower.
- Fc and Gain could also be adjusted on the touch screen by dragging the pointer left/right and up/down.
- The sound is adjusted/updated in real time as you move the filter peak and frequency.

Page 4 – Sound Analysis and Pair up.
Page 5 – Comparison, Wired/wireless connection, and Conclusion.

I have the Lotoo Paw 6000, paired mostly with 64 Audio – U12t, also occasionally, Focal Utopia or Audeze LCD-i4. I recently demoed a iBasso dx170, and while it’s a nice unit, the Lotoo Paw 6000–at more than twice the price has much better SQ. I have upgrade-itis, and was thinking of the Lotoo Paw GT or the iBasso DX 320. The iBasso is appealing because of its streaming ability, but I am wondering about it’s well-regarded sound quality versus that of the LPGT? I am also wondering if perhaps the LPGT is due soon for an upgrade and whether I should wait. I would so appreciate your comments and suggestions, including any other DAPs that you think should be in the mix. Thanks!
LikeLike
I’m not aware of LPGT being up for upgrade. Lotoo has a long cycle with every release and they recently teased a new product which is a desktop transportable DAP (very expensive). DX320 would be great and they just announced 10 year Edition X of DX320, beautiful looking liquid metal chassis. It will cost extra, but that DAP is a thing of beauty. LPGT is great, but with DX320 you are getting android and swappable amp cards, including amp13 with NuTube.
LikeLike
Thanks! I really appreciate the super quick, super informative reply.
LikeLike
I have the dx 220 with amp 9. Do you think DX 320 would be a big upgrade from this in terms of sound and is the DX 320 Edition X worth it?
LikeLike
Edition X has just a different chassis material, everything else is the same. So, if you have extra money and want extra bling, why not! Otherwise, you will be fine with a regular DX320. Regarding DX220 w/amp9, I don’t like amp9, my least favorite of their amp modules, it is underpowered and has a high noise floor. DX320 w/amp13 (nutube as well) will be a noticeable improvement. How big? That is a relative subjective opinion. A quieter sound with less noise floor alone is a big deal for me when going from amp9 to amp13. Then, you have later and more advanced Android, faster processor, dual battery architecture, and other advanced features going from dx220 to dx320.
LikeLike
Excellent review as always!!!!
Did you use sei Xe6 Uni or Custom? As it is with the Costum, Dx320 (amp 11mk2)
LikeLike
I used uni, just faster to get it in and out of my ears, but I personally prefer custom XE6 because the sound is more balanced with mids being a little more forward and sound signature being less L-shaped and more W-shaped.
LikeLike
I saw the artists you listen to in your reviews and how does it sound for example Linkin Park on the Dx320 amp11 mk2, and with your Xe6 costum? Can you experience this?
Thanks
LikeLike
Excellent Review!! Based off your review I got the DX320 and happy with it. Off late the upgrade bug has bitten me. Do you think that the SP3000 or M9 Plus would be huge improvment over the DX320 to justify putting down the cash?
All DAPs will be paired with IE600 or Focal Stellia.
LikeLike
I’m not familiar with M9+, and not a big fan of v+shaped tuning of original M9, but heard from others M9+ is tuned more balanced. SP3k will be more neutral, but it a locked android OS, some find it a bit frustrating and slow. Bottom line, nothing going to be a huge improvement. At the flagship level you will find a variation going from dap to dap, like different flavors of premium ice cream, if that makes sense. Now, DX 320 Max Ti is on a whole different level if you get a chance to hear it 🙂
LikeLike
Hi
I own ibasso dx300 with amp12 and want to try out a tube amp module.
How does amp12 compares to amp13 and amp14. I want to drive hifiman sundara and denon ah-d9200. So no heavy loads. Which one should I choose
Thanks in advance Jonathan
LikeLike
https://twister6.com/2022/12/28/ibasso-amp14/2/, I covered some of these comparisons there. And yeah, should be plenty of power to cover your needs. Amp14 is my favorite amp module 😉
LikeLike
Thanks yeah I read the review after writing my post maybe I will buy amp14 to check out. Its really nice to have these amps with different sound flavours
Cheers Jonathan
LikeLike