Sony NW-WM1Z DAP

GUI.

With 1Z being my first Sony DAP, I wasn’t sure what to expect, but ended up being pleasantly surprised by the simplicity of its very efficient interface. One thing to mention before getting into GUI, how responsive and fast the navigation of its touch screen is. I never experienced any lag between swiping, and the only complained I had turned out to be due to my unfamiliarity with Sony interface. In order to swipe forward/back through the song, you have to tap and hold the bar for a second and then swipe it to a new position. Instead, I was swiping without tapping first, and couldn’t understand why I was switching between the screens. Tap’n’swipe is actually a good idea, to prevent accidental song forwarding. And of course, you can always use hw control buttons on the right side.

Now, about the GUI. The main Playback screen has a very simple and efficient layout. At the top you have a volume bar, representing 120 steps. You tap on it, and it brings up a large circular volume adjustment in a window where you can tap -/+ or swipe the volume around the dial. Underneath the volume bar at the top, you have file format and bit depth of the file you’re listening to, along with a numeric volume value to the right of it. Just below it you can also find play/pause icon on the left side and the battery indicator on the right side. Underneath of it, half of the screen is occupied by a cover art (if embedded picture is available and valid), which can also be replaced with either Spectrum Analyzer or Analog Level Meter.

In the lower half of the screen you have a swipe bar to fast forward/back through the song with a total song time, current song marker, and a song number in queue. The song name is underneath of it, then below it you have Playback touch controls, with Play/Pause in the middle, Skip Next/Prev (multi-functional with fast forward/back when press’n’hold), and Play Mode controls which have been added in fw 2.0. All the way to the left you have Shuffle Playback select, and all the way to the right you have Repeat off, Repeat all, and Repeat 1 song touch control. These Play Mode controls were already available under Setting, but now they’re conveniently located on top without a need to dig through Settings menu.

From the main Playback screen, you swipe to get to the screen on the right which has 10 Bookmark Lists, or swipe to the screen on the left which has a Play Queue (where you can also choose to view more song details or add it to Playlist or Bookmark List). When you swipe to the screen at the top, you will have a choice of file sorting to view All Songs, Playlist, Hi-Res files, Album, Artist, Genre, Release Year, Composer, Recent Transfers, Folder, or SensMe Channels. This sorting list is easy to customize when you click toolbox icon at the bottom and choose Select Items to Display. As a matter of fact, this toolbox menu icon, will always have a link to the main Settings menu, and also separate settings applicable to that specific screen.

Swiping to the bottom screen brings up a selection of DSP effects which can also been disabled at once by selecting Direct Source On. I will talk in more details about these DSP Effects in the next section of the review. One thing I found very useful is that no matter which screen you go to, except for Settings menu, you always have access to the bottom playback touch controls. And below it, you have a Return back button on the left, and toolbox button on the right. In the middle, you have return to Playback screen button and File sorting screen button.

It does take a few minutes to figure out and get used to this window arrangement, but then it becomes a second nature, very intuitive. The idea is to have everything under your fingertips with a main focus around Playback screen, and everything else within a swipe away.

Settings menu is very simple as well. You start off with Brightness icon (tap to get into the setting) and Bluetooth on/off icon. Next, Basic Settings with Playback, Output, and Device settings. In Playback, you have Play Mode with shuffle and repeat modes, Playback Range, Sleep Timer, Artist list sorting display, and Lyrics display with an option to keep the screen on. In Output setting you have AVLS volume limit enable, High Gain output enable (individually set for either 3.5mm SE or 4.4mm BAL outputs), L/R balance, USB output for DSP (auto or DoP), and DSD Playback setting options.

Device Setting has more generic options such as beep setting, touch panel handling with Hold switch, USB connection options, Auto Power off, Battery care, Clock setting, language setting, Text Input, and Reset/Format where you can reset all the settings, format either internal storage or uSD card, rebuild database, or restore to factory config.

The top main Setting menu also has Bluetooth setting menu to connect to and to add new devices, enable NFC, Bluetooth info, and under Other the unit info where you can confirm FW setting, available storage space, and total hours of audio playback.

DSP Effects.

When Direct Sound is turned off, you are enabling the EQ and DSP effects which can be individually turned on or off. I will talk in more details about each effect below.

Paragraphic EQ (fixed Q)/ Tone Control – In this window you have access to either 10 Band EQ with a fixed frequency bands (31Hz, 62Hz, 125Hz, 250Hz, 500Hz, 1kHz, 2kHz, 4kHz, 8kHz, 16kHz) or a simplified Tone Control adjustment with only three bands for Bass, Middle, and Treble. Each of these bands, either EQ or Tone, could be adjusted in steps from +10 to -10. In general, adjustment was smooth and natural, no artificial aliasing. You switch between EQ and Tone adjustment by tapping tool box, which also has an option to Save a sound setting.

DSEE HX – upscales the original compressed or CD quality audio to the equivalent of high-res audio. Here you have 5 different settings from a drop-down menu:

Standard – to my ears it expands soundstage width/depth/height, and improves some of the dynamics/transparency, and it feels like you have a little more air between the layers of the sound.

Female Voice / Male Voice / Percussion / Strings – across these 4 settings, I hear that we start with Standard dynamics expansion as a baseline, and then vary compression of the sound, focusing specifically on frequency band occupied by either vocals, percussions, or string instruments. It’s a subtle effect which is hard to describe, but I’m hearing it as a sound compression effect with a focus on a bandwidth occupied by specific vocals/sounds.

sony_wm1z-49

DC Phase Linerarizer – the effect which makes the low frequency phase characteristics of the player closer to a traditional analog amplifier. It’s like trying different solid-state amplifiers with a focus on low end emphasis. This effect has its own presets with Type A and B, with each having Low and High variations.

Type A Standard – tightens the bass, adds some coloration to low end, has more emphasis on sub-bass, and some lower mids (a little more body).

– Low/High variation – low gives it a little warmer tonality variation with more rumble, while high shifts this tonality variation closer to mid-bass/lower mids.

Type B Standard – tightens the bass, adds some coloration to low end, has more emphasis on mid-bass, while keeping lower mids more neutral.

– Low/High variation – low gives it a little warmer tonality with a shift that’s a little more toward the sub-bass, while high relaxes sub-bass while still keeping lower mids neutral.

These adjustments can really finetune the low end of your song, but to hear the effect of it you need higher res headphones with a good low-end extension.

sony_wm1z-50

Dynamic Normalizer – It’s quite an effective hardware type of normalize which first compresses and then raises the volume of the track to match the loudness going from one song to the other. Sony refers to this effect as it minimizes the volume differences between the songs, but at the expense of the compression which raises the volume and kills the dynamics in many tracks I tested. I personally wouldn’t use this effect.

sony_wm1z-51

Page 4: Sound analysis, Comparison.

Page 5: Pair up, Wireless connection, Conclusion.

21 thoughts on “Sony NW-WM1Z DAP

  1. Great review. While I think the 1z is crazy in price, from everything I’ve read the 1A sounds similar, with the same excellent soundstage but maybe slightly different color across the spectrum.

    I had been wondering about the Cowon Plenue R as a good portable player with good battery life, but then started thinking of spending more for a DX200 (as I’d been impressed with the DX80). But after reading this and the available comparisons between the 1Z and 1A, it looks like the 1A is great value for money, with excellent sound, battery life and GUI.

    Like

    1. you definitely have to take into consideration the “diminishing returns” factor. 1Z will have premium components which going to result in fine-tuned sound in comparison to 1A, but the sound quality improvement is not 3x better. A block of pure copper material is VERY expensive, and manufacturing/milling is additional cost… Plenue R I’m familiar with, but some told me ZX300 might be compatible and some say check out AK70mkII as well. Too many choices… I would recommend starting with figuring out your budget first. Then, if you need streaming apps, power requirements, 2.5mm or 4.4mm balanced (depending on your headphones). That would help you to narrow down your selection.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Completely agree – too many choices! You’ve been giving me some advice on the Plenue R thread at head-fi too, and I’m thinking I might just bite the bullet, spend more and avoid further upgrades. Thanks for your input and reviews, very helpful!

        Like

  2. Your review of this DAP is really close of what i hear in the AK380, even in the balanced port….in the beggining some people compare it…even the idea of the body material as grounding effect to the sound…what I can’t believe too much, sony takes this thing of body material to a new high level with copper and gold (too much bling for my taste)…in my opinion maybe the difference in sound between 1z and 1a and between AK380 models are caused by different sound tunings and less caused by this premium materials, but i’ts only my opinion…
    The Sony ZX2 was a really good sounding android DAP, maybe too analytical or digital, but sounds good (i have it in his time), then the warm-neutral sound leads the ears of the audiophile crowd and sony reacts with this WM1 series…
    Your review was very good as always, maybe in the near future I think in a new sony DAP to my collection since the sound description is near to my tastes

    Regards

    Like

    1. You can’t really compare 1Z to 1A directly, assuming the sound change is due to different chassis material, they use different critical components that will influence the difference in sound. But i did confirm, the circiut ground is connected to the chassis, so you have a better conducting massive ground.

      Like

  3. Mmm…you mean the kimber cable vs ofc cable of the internal wiring??….the circuit ground connected to the chasis are the same excuse for AK for the use of different materials (copper ot SS), of course you have better conductivness with this features….and this maybe increase the medible sound quality…
    But the difference in sound described by users i think is more akin to sound tunning in both brands, even more with the Sony because it’s already have too much digital sound effects in his DAPs
    But to me this is not a bad thing, the quality of the construction and the materials and the different sound tunning will obviously raise the price

    Like

  4. Ok I understand… I don’t want to begin an Apple vs Samsung discussion, i don’t want to bite the hands of the brands that feed my ears…
    I don’t want to discuss the internal features of this DAP, i only believe that the tunning of sound differences between WM1 series are more important than the physical differences when we talk about sound coloration and maybe even sound quality …but is only my opinion

    Peace 🙂

    Like

    1. Don’t think they care about 1A review since zx300 sounds very close. So, no with 1A. Plus, it’s getting old already, companies prefer to promote their new or newer releases.

      Like

  5. I’m having a hard time hearing a difference between se and balanced to be honest. I was going to go out and get new cables terminated in 4.4 for my iems but i feel that probably not needed.

    I mean you could argue the se is “burned in” and the balanced is not if you believe in that. I’ve only tried the balanced today. Maybe i just don’t have great hearing, shrug.

    Like

    1. What is your iems/headphones? Do you have the latest 2.x fw? There was a much bigger difference in fw 1.2 between se and bal. Also, depends on how resolving your headphones too, and of course, we all have a different hearing level. Consider it as blessing if you can’t hear a difference, will save you on new cables lol!

      Like

  6. I am in love with my Sony NW-WM1A. I use Sennheiser HD650 headphones in balance, as well as Shure SRH1540 headphones. As much as I love it, I’m getting the upgrade bug for the 1Z. I am blown away by how well it drives the 650s. It sounds better than off my Paw Gold Diana, which has much more power. Power alone doesn’t dictate how well a headphone sounds.

    Like

    1. don’t have experience with any full size Senns cans, but I can imagine the tonality and the resolution will scale up with 1Z 🙂 I tested ZX300 at canjam, so using that as a baseline because many people tell me that ZX300 is 85-90% in sound quality of WM1A (just going by what others said). To me ZX300 was nice, but had this “digital” coloring. WM1Z sounds like an analog desktop piece of gear. I like SP1000 a lot as well, but 1Z still has this analog tonality like no other daps.

      Like

    1. all 3 are good, in their own way. Read my reviews, figure out your own personal Cons and Pros, see which sound you would prefer (especially based on pair up with different earphones and headphones). I know, too many choices 😦

      Like

  7. > In high gain, I hear more sub-bass rumble, mids have more body, there is improved layering, better retrieval of details, and treble has more sparkle.

    Thank you for putting this in the Review.

    That way i instantly new that nothing of this is wroth anything and i can easily forget what i read and look for a more serious review.

    Like

    1. You are referring to an ancient 4+ year old review, back when I was getting my feet wet 🙂 But the key point there, wm1z is so underpowered by today’s standards. The balanced output in high gain at maximum volume only has 125mW of power, it is literally a joke by today’s standards. Now, drop it to low gain and depending on a specific pair up synergy with whatever used for testing, it could be night and day in comparison to when you switch to a high gain. Now, 4+ years later and dozens of daps I have tested, wm1z has been surpassed by many.

      Like

Leave a comment